Research library
26% of this field can show a deployment. Read the method →

What the public record actually shows

Fifty short reports built on the same rule as the index itself: every factual claim carries an openable source, and where the only source is the company, the page says so. Thirteen company profiles, twelve category surveys and twenty-five analysis pieces and buyer guides.

50 articles13 profiles12 categories25 analysis piecesUpdated 24 August 2026

Start here

6 articles

Company profiles

All 13 →

Profiles of the 13 Israeli defence-AI companies with a named public source reporting operational military use. Each entry sets out what the company builds, what the public record shows, and what is not established.

ISR & sensor fusion

Axon Vision: What the Public Record Shows About Its Battlefield AI

Axon Vision is graded L3 Operational in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. Globes reported IDF use of its counter-drone AI. See the full record.

Simulation & training

Bagira Systems: Instrumented Training, and Who Reports Using It

Bagira Systems is graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. Israel Defense reported the British Army expanding use of its simulation systems.

Simulation & training

Combatica: VR Rehearsal for Security Forces, and Its Public Evidence

Combatica VR training is graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. NoCamels reported use by Israeli forces. What the record does not show.

Autonomous air systems

eyesAtop: One Operator, Many Drones — the Documented Record

eyesAtop is graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. Calcalist reported an IDF attack-drone platform selection. See the full sourced record.

C2 & decision support

mPrest Systems: The Software Layer Behind Air-Defence Decisions

mPrest is graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. Calcalist reported Israel blocking a US takeover of the Iron Dome software firm. Read on.

C2 & decision support

Ottopia: Teleoperation for Military Vehicles, and What Is Published

Ottopia teleoperation is graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. The Jerusalem Post reported IDF remote operation of ground vehicles. Read on.

Autonomous ground & maritime

Roboteam: Unmanned Ground Systems and the Evidence for Their Use

Roboteam is graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. Breaking Defense reported operational use and a US Marine Corps order. See the record.

Counter-UAS

Robotican: Interceptor Drones and the Public Deployment Trail

Robotican is graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. Read the dated public sources behind the grade, and what they still cannot establish.

Targeting & fire control

SMARTSHOOTER: Fire Control AI and the US Army Expansion Report

SMARTSHOOTER is graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. The dated contracts and reporting behind the grade, and the limits of that record.

ISR & sensor fusion

ThirdEye Systems: Onboard Vision, Exports and the Public Record

ThirdEye Systems is graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. The dated reporting behind the grade, the export trail, and what remains unproven.

Autonomous ground & maritime

TSG IT Advanced Systems: The Brain Behind Military Ground Robots

TSG IT Advanced Systems is graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. The sourcing behind the grade, the ownership structure, and its known limits.

Autonomous air systems

UVision Air: Loitering Munitions and Reported Operational Use

UVision loitering munitions are graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. The dated procurement trail behind the grade, and what it cannot show.

Autonomous air systems

XTEND: Operator-Guided Autonomy and What Has Been Reported

XTEND drones are graded L3 in the Israeli Defence-AI Deployment Index. The dated US and Israeli contracts behind the grade, and the limits of that record.

Category pillars

All 12 →

Twelve category surveys of the Israeli defence-AI field, each giving the grade distribution inside the category and the published source behind every entry.

Category pillars

Israeli Counter-UAS Companies: Graded by Public Deployment Evidence

Eleven Israeli counter-drone companies graded by published deployment evidence: one L3, five L2, one L1, four L0. Every grade links to its public source.

Category pillars

Israeli ISR and Sensor-Fusion AI: The Documented Deployments

Seven Israeli ISR AI companies graded on published deployment evidence: two L3, three L2, one L1, one L0. Each entry links to the source behind its grade.

Category pillars

Israeli Autonomous Air Systems: Contracts, Trials and Claims

Seven Israeli autonomous drone companies graded on public evidence: three L3, two L2, one L1, one L0. Every entry links to the source behind its grade.

Category pillars

Israeli Autonomous Ground and Maritime Systems, Graded

Six Israeli unmanned ground vehicle and maritime AI firms graded on published evidence: two L3, one L2, one L1, two L0. Each links to its own public source.

Category pillars

Israeli Military C2 and Decision-Support AI

Four Israeli military decision support AI companies graded on public evidence: two L3, two L2, none at L1 or L0. Each entry links to its published source.

Category pillars

Israeli Military Simulation and Training AI

Five Israeli military training simulation companies graded on published evidence: two L3, three L2, none lower. Each entry links to the source behind it.

Category pillars

Israeli Electronic Warfare and SIGINT AI: Two Graded Entries

Only two Israeli SIGINT companies clear this index's inclusion test — one at L2 Contract, one at L1 Trial. See the published source behind each grade.

Category pillars

Israeli Military Cyber AI: What Is Publicly Contracted

Three Israeli military cyber companies sit in this index at L2, L1 and L0. None has a reported operational deployment. Read the source behind every grade.

Category pillars

Israeli Space and Satellite ISR AI: Two Contract Grades

Both Israeli satellite intelligence companies in this index sit at L2 · Contract — ImageSat and Tomorrow.io. Neither reports operational use. Open the sources.

Category pillars

Israeli Active Protection AI: Why Only One Company Qualifies

Active protection systems Israel is a primes' business: only BIRD Aerosystems clears this index's inclusion test, at L2 · Contract. Here is the reasoning.

Category pillars

Israeli Targeting and Fire Control AI: A Category of One

One Israeli AI fire control system reaches L3 · Operational in this index — SMARTSHOOTER — and nothing else qualifies. Read why the category is one entry.

Category pillars

Israeli Military Logistics AI: The Thinnest Category

Military predictive maintenance AI is the index's thinnest category: one Israeli company, Odysight.ai, at L2 · Contract. See what the public record holds.

Analysis and buyer guides

All 25 →

Twenty-five pieces on what the index found and how to use it: the evidence gap, the grading rules, and practical guides for verifying a vendor’s deployment claims.

Analysis and buyer guides

Three Quarters of Israeli Defence-AI Firms Have No Public Deployment Evidence

Of 50 Israeli defence-AI companies indexed, only 13 have a public source describing operational military use. Here is what the other 37 do and do not show.

Analysis and buyer guides

Funding Stage Is Not Deployment Evidence

Israeli defence-tech raised over $1bn in 2025, but the index's best-funded entries sit at L2 and L0. Why funding stage tells a buyer nothing about fielding.

Analysis and buyer guides

What "Battle-Tested" Means When Nobody Publishes the Test

"Battle-tested" is the most common phrase in Israeli defence marketing and the least verifiable. How the index grades a claim when the test is never published.

Analysis and buyer guides

The Undisclosed-Customer Problem in Defence Contract Announcements

An undisclosed defence contract announcement is verifiable and nearly useless. How "a European NATO member" and "an APAC agency" shape 22 L2 grades in the index.

Analysis and buyer guides

Three Categories Came Back Almost Bare

Three of twelve Israeli defence AI categories yielded one qualifying company each. Active protection, fire control and sustainment, and why startups are absent.

Analysis and buyer guides

The English-Language Bias in Israeli Defence-Tech Research

All 50 index sources are English-language. Why that biases Israeli defence tech research downward, which grades it suppresses, and what would correct it.

Analysis and buyer guides

Press Release or Reporting: Grading the Difference

Eight of 50 index grades rest on issuer-controlled releases and none of them is L3. How defence press release verification separates a wire item from reporting.

Analysis and buyer guides

The 2023–2024 Cohort and Its Evidence Gap

Six Israeli defence tech startups founded in 2023 or 2024 appear in the index. None is graded L3. What that reveals about time to public deployment evidence.

Analysis and buyer guides

Why the Israeli Primes Are Excluded From This Index

Elbit, Rafael and IAI reported roughly $22bn of 2025 revenue between them and are absent from this index. The inclusion rule, and the honest cost of applying it.

Analysis and buyer guides

Why This Index Does Not Link Products to Named Strikes

The index records that a system was reported in use. It never links a product to a named strike. The rule, the reasons for it, and the case against it.

Analysis and buyer guides

Counter-UAS Is the Most Crowded Category in Israeli Defence AI

Eleven of 50 index entries are counter-UAS, spread across every grade. Four of them sit at L0. The crowding, the arithmetic and what it means for buyers.

Analysis and buyer guides

What Moves a Company From L0 to L3

Each grade in the index has one threshold and one document that crosses it. Here is exactly which published artefact moves a company from L0 to L1, L2 and L3.

Analysis and buyer guides

What a Deployment Index Cannot Tell You

Six questions this index of 50 Israeli defence-AI companies cannot answer, stated plainly, with the specific entries that show where each limit bites.

Analysis and buyer guides

How to Verify a Defence AI Vendor's Deployment Claims

A four-step method to verify defence vendor claims before you shortlist: parse the sentence, find the primary record, date it, and grade what actually remains.

Analysis and buyer guides

Procurement Due Diligence for Autonomy Suppliers: A Checklist

Twenty-five checks across evidence, autonomy, export, data and sustainment: a defence procurement due diligence checklist for buying autonomy, not slideware.

Analysis and buyer guides

Israeli Counter-Drone Companies With Publicly Announced Contracts

Six Israeli counter-drone contracts sit on the public record, from Robotican to Sentrycs. Each entry names the publisher and links to the source you can open.

Analysis and buyer guides

The 13 Israeli Defence-AI Companies With Documented Operational Use

Thirteen Israeli military AI companies have a named public source reporting operational military use. Every entry lists the publisher and a link you can open.

Analysis and buyer guides

Israeli Defence Export Controls: What a Foreign Buyer Should Check

An Israeli defence export licence is not one document but several, issued at different stages by two ministries. What a buyer should ask, and where to check.

Analysis and buyer guides

Israeli Defence-Tech Landscape Maps Compared

Published Israeli defence tech landscape map projects count between 160 and 334 companies. What each measures, why the totals differ, and what all of them omit.

Analysis and buyer guides

Detect, Track, Defeat: A Counter-UAS Vocabulary for Buyers

The counter-UAS detect, track, defeat sequence is doctrine, not marketing. What each stage means, who defines it, and which claims to test first.

Analysis and buyer guides

Loitering Munitions and Attack Drones: Definitions That Matter

A loitering munition definition is not settled. Doctrine, arms control and humanitarian law each draw the line differently. Here is what each one says.

Analysis and buyer guides

In the Loop, On the Loop, Out of the Loop

In the loop, on the loop, out of the loop: what human in the loop weapons policy says, who defines each term, and precisely where states disagree today.

Analysis and buyer guides

Buying Military Simulation and Training AI

Military simulation procurement turns on three things: the LVC taxonomy, interoperability standards, and accreditation. Plus what the Israeli record shows.

Analysis and buyer guides

TRL Is Not Deployment Evidence

A technology readiness level describes maturity in a test environment. Deployment evidence names who used the system. Why buyers should not confuse them.

Analysis and buyer guides

Twenty Questions for a Defence AI Vendor's First Meeting

Twenty defence AI vendor questions for a first meeting, each with why it matters and what a weak answer sounds like. Built from public procurement guidance.

The index behind all of this

Fifty Israeli defence-AI companies, graded L0 to L3 by publicly documented deployment evidence rather than funding stage.

Open the index